|
Excerpt from the exhibition essay I want to make something
I don't understand, by Sarah Lowndes.
The full text is included in the publication Four Exhibitions:
October 2008 - August 2009
(click for larger images)

Asked why he
often destroyed each morning the work of the previous day, Piet Mondrian
replied, ‘I don’t want pictures. I just want to find things out.’[i]
Mondrian’s rigorous consideration of how to ‘visualize clearly’ the
relations that exist between things underpinned his progression towards
the representations he called ‘abstract-real’.[ii] His emphasis on a reductive vocabulary of forms as a means of
accentuating relationships is also a central aspect of the works made by
the Glasgow-based artist David Bellingham (b.1966).
Bellingham,
however, does not work in search of a conclusion – instead, he says, ‘I
want to make something I don’t understand.’[iii]
He explains, ‘I think what I’m interested in is the active sense of
proposition in Wittgenstein’s sense, of kicking an idea into play or
igniting a debate’.[iv]
His work is assembled from the ‘spare parts’ of existence, represented as
footnotes on culture, as for instance in Bus tickets for Piet Mondrian
(1993), a pair of small tickets coloured in to resemble neo-plastic
paintings.
Bellingham’s installations employ photographs, text and found and familiar
objects such as fruit, rulers, stones and envelopes to make
concise and
often poetic observations on the condition of ‘being in the world.’ His
work also circulates beyond the immediate audience through the prolific
books, pamphlets, cards and other printed material he publishes under his
imprint Wax366. Bellingham’s practice, as Pavel Buchler has observed,
‘tests, case by case, the conditions of art as a model of resistance to
the numbing complexity of the rules of our engagement with the world and
with one another.’[v]
Often
Bellingham refers to objects and experiences that may
be catalysts for the synaesthetic blurring of |
senses,
whereby sensations in one modality, such as hearing or reading a symbolic
representation, such as a letter, number or word, produces sensations in
another modality, such as colour. This is the case in his many works
using citrus fruit, such as two facing pages in his book Fresh Fruit
and Tables (2008), one of which is printed with the legend ‘FRUIT IN
VARIOUS FLAVOURS’, the other ‘COLOURS IN VARIOUS FLAVOURS’. The work from
which the title of the exhibition at HICA is taken, 40w 60w 100w is a
photograph of three fruits lying on a wet grey road.

Mondrian
observed that, ‘Reducing natural colour to primary colour changes the most
outward manifestation of colour back to the most inward.’[vi]
While Bellingham’s restricted palette signifies a continued homage to
Mondrian, the method of articulation – as with the bus ticket – reveals a
conflicted admiration.
[i] Piet Mondrian, quoted
in Carl Holty, “Mondrian in New York”, Arts, September 1957, p.21,
quoted in Yves-Alain Bois, “The Iconoclast”, Piet Mondrian,
(New York: Bulfinch Press, 1994), p.316.
[ii] Yves-Alain Bois, “The
Iconoclast”, Piet Mondrian, (New York: Bulfinch Press, 1994),
p.316.
[iii] David
Bellingham, in conversation with the author, HICA, Dores, June 28th
2009.
[iv]
David Bellingham, “Art & The Political Seminar: Part 2
Democracy and
Its Discontents”, Art and Research, Vol. 1, no. 2, Summer 2007,
http://www.artandresearch.org.uk/v1n2/bellingham.html
[v] Pavel Buchler, Little
Things in the Margins”, David Bellingham, ASP, (Nurnberg:
Kunsthaus Nurnberg, 2001), p.97.
[vi] Piet Mondrian, “De
Nieuwe Beelding”, De Stijl I, 3, January 1918, Martin James and
Harry Holtzman, The New Art – The New Life: The Collected Writings
of Piet Mondrian, (Boston, 1986), p. 36 quoted in Yves-Alain Bois,
“The Iconoclast”, Piet Mondrian, (New York: Bulfinch Press,
1994), p.319.
|