|
Concrete Now!
Chris Tosic’s ‘Untitled
Logical Forms’ (the title referring to Wittgenstein’s analysis of forms
underlying language) are at first sight a collection of small-scale
non-representational paintings. Closer inspection reveals too precise
lines, too sharp corners and a mechanically smooth finish, which suggests
they have, at least largely, been printed. They could be the product of a
home computer. This effectively updates the work from what might be
original Constructivist, De Stijl or Bauhaus images, to those same,
regurgitated by our current, possibly sterile and consumer lead, culture.
The pieces readily connect with their surroundings. The radiator in the
HICA gallery, the result of the use of a domestic space, echoes
immediately ‘Untitled Logical Form 5’ for instance, suggesting a more
Duchampian interest. The space itself is a ‘modern conversion’: a type of
modern design imposed onto older farm buildings. The images seem to ally
themselves with the fate of the building, and almost disappear into their
surroundings taking on the mantle of mass-produced art; the art of IKEA,
B&Q, Argos even. In this way they present themselves as compromised
things, but in a gallery context, perhaps suggest this as an opportunity,
an opportunity to consider what is good and desirable about their state,
and what isn’t, as there are better and worse aspects to the space they
inhabit. Connecting all this with |

(click for
larger image) |
|
Wittgenstein
might be proposing that the process underlying language, in this case a
language of interior design as well as painting, is a much more complex
issue than an idea of ‘logical forms’ might imply. It may be based on a
muddle of imperfect individual understandings, taking ideas forward over
time, a thought perhaps more in tune with Wittgenstein’s later ideas of
meaning-as-use. If we consider how many conversations are taking place at
any one time, how frequently words are employed, we can see what an
enormously complicated process the slow incremental shaping of language
appears to be.
The opportunity then is perhaps to reflect on how we judge the use of
words or images. It is these judgements as they appear to each individual,
which are the material of the work. |